Lesson 7 of 10 intermediate

Real Estate Rentals: How the Money Actually Moves

Rent in, expenses out, depreciation on paper, and a set of loss rules that may quietly park your deduction for later

Open interactive version (quiz + challenge)

Real-world analogy

A rental is a small shop that sells one product: shelter, by the month. Like any shop, the till total is not the profit. Rent is the till. Tax, insurance, repairs, vacancy and management are the costs of keeping the shutter open. And there is one strange expense you never actually pay in cash — depreciation — which the tax code lets you claim as the building wears out.

What is it?

A residential rental is property you own and rent to others, reported on Schedule E of your federal return. You report the rent you receive, deduct ordinary and necessary operating expenses, and separately depreciate the BUILDING (not the land) over 27.5 years using straight-line depreciation. IRS Publication 527 sets out when the clock starts: "You can begin to depreciate rental property when it is ready and available for rent" — not when the first tenant signs.

Real-world relevance

The practical shape of a rental year: a lease, twelve rent payments that are hopefully on time, one or two repairs, an insurance renewal, a property tax bill, and a tax return where the paper depreciation deduction often turns a cash-positive property into a taxable loss. Then the rules that catch people: the passive activity limits may suspend that loss instead of letting you use it, and every dollar of depreciation you claim reduces your basis and comes back as recapture when you sell — the mechanic you saw in lesson 4.

Key points

Code example

ONE RENTAL YEAR: CASH FLOW vs TAXABLE INCOME
=============================================
(Illustrative. Your facts and rates will differ.)

THE PROPERTY
  Purchase price ................. $275,000
  Land portion (per assessment) .. $ 55,000
  Building (depreciable) ......... $220,000
  Annual depreciation
    = $220,000 / 27.5 ............ $  8,000

CASH SIDE OF THE YEAR
  Rent collected (12 x $1,900) ... $ 22,800
  Property tax ................... -$ 3,400
  Insurance ...................... -$ 1,450
  Repairs ........................ -$ 1,900
  Management ..................... -$ 1,824
  Mortgage INTEREST .............. -$ 9,100
  Mortgage PRINCIPAL ............. -$ 3,300
  ---------------------------------------
  CASH IN YOUR POCKET ............ $ 1,826

TAX SIDE OF THE SAME YEAR (Schedule E)
  Rental income .................. $ 22,800
  Property tax ................... -$ 3,400
  Insurance ...................... -$ 1,450
  Repairs ........................ -$ 1,900
  Management ..................... -$ 1,824
  Mortgage interest .............. -$ 9,100
  Depreciation (no cash paid) .... -$ 8,000
  Principal is NOT deductible .... $      0
  ---------------------------------------
  TAXABLE RESULT ................. -$ 2,874
                                   (a LOSS)

SO: +$1,826 in your bank
    -$2,874 on your tax return
Both are true. Depreciation and the
non-deductible principal payment are the
entire difference.

AND REMEMBER: that $8,000 of depreciation
reduces your basis, so it comes back as
recapture on the day you sell.

Line-by-line walkthrough

  1. 1. First, split the purchase price between land and building. Only the $220,000 building depreciates, at $220,000 divided by 27.5 years = $8,000 a year.
  2. 2. On the CASH side, everything you actually pay leaves the account — including the mortgage principal — so $1,826 is what genuinely accumulates over the year.
  3. 3. On the TAX side, two lines behave differently. Mortgage principal is not a deductible expense (it is repaying a loan, not a cost of operating), so it disappears from the tax column.
  4. 4. Depreciation appears in the tax column even though no money moved. That single $8,000 line is what flips a cash-positive property to a taxable loss of $2,874.
  5. 5. Both numbers are correct at the same time. Cash flow answers 'can I pay the bills'; taxable income answers 'what do I owe'. Confusing the two is how landlords end up surprised in both directions.
  6. 6. OUTCOME: whether you can actually USE that $2,874 loss depends on the passive activity rules — up to $25,000 for active participants, phasing out between $100,000 and $150,000 of modified AGI. And the $8,000 of depreciation is borrowed, not given: it reduces basis and returns as unrecaptured Section 1250 gain when you sell.

Spot the bug

Landlord's plan: 'I am not going to claim depreciation on my rental. I would rather show more income now, and that way there is no depreciation recapture to pay when I sell in fifteen years.'
Need a hint?
Look up the exact phrase the recapture rules use about depreciation that was not taken.
Show answer
This strategy pays twice and saves nothing. Depreciation recapture applies to depreciation ALLOWED OR ALLOWABLE — meaning the basis reduction happens whether or not you actually claimed the deduction. So this landlord gives up fifteen years of real deductions AND still faces recapture computed as if they had taken them. It is the single worst possible ordering. If depreciation was genuinely missed in prior years, the fix is not to keep ignoring it; a tax professional can look at correcting the accounting method (Form 3115) rather than simply amending forever. And note the second error hiding underneath: 'more income now' also means more tax now, at ordinary rates, which is usually higher than the recapture rate later.

Explain like I'm 5

When you rent out a house, people pay you rent every month. But you also pay for repairs, insurance and taxes, so you keep less than the rent. The government also lets you count a little bit of the building 'wearing out' every year as a cost, even though you did not pay anyone for it. That makes your taxes smaller now — but when you sell the house one day, they add that part back up.

Fun fact

Residential rental buildings are depreciated over 27.5 years and commercial buildings over 39 years — but land is never depreciated at all, no matter how long you hold it. That is why the land-to-building split on your purchase, usually taken from the county assessment ratio, quietly determines thousands of dollars of deductions across the life of a rental.

Hands-on challenge

Take any rental you own or are considering and build both columns for one year: the cash column and the Schedule E column. The two numbers will differ, and the gap should be explained entirely by depreciation plus the non-deductible principal portion of your mortgage payment. If you cannot make the gap reconcile to those two items, something in your expense list is misclassified — find it now, not in April.

More resources

Open interactive version (quiz + challenge) ← Back to course: Real Estate